| DOE Home | Calendar | Site Index | DOE WebCam |

Administrative Memorandum
 

April
2004

bd15155_1

In every issue:

bd15155_1

bs00975_ Upcoming Events

Lsrprnt2 Printable Version


Filebox Admin Memo Archive

bd15155_1

  pencil2 SIGN UP NOW!
          
Receive the Admin
             Memo via email

Your email address is:

bd15155_1
For editorial information,
contact Karon Schaack at karon.schaack@state.sd.us.
bd15155_1


It is the policy of the Department of Education to provide services to all persons, without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sex, disability, ancestry, or national origin, in accordance with federal and state laws.

 

 

Bridgewater senior calls for cooperation among communities 

Scott Stahl, Bridgewater senior, submitted the following editorial as a part of a scholarship competition.  It is reprinted here in its entirety.

Small Schools in South Dakota

Dear Editor:

            The situation of small schools in rural South Dakota has become a battle of epic proportions that will determine the future of our state.  Cities, which were once thriving with business, are now nearing extinction because of a downfall in the activity of local economies.  Each and every city may have a different situation, but the overall origin of the problem remains the same, a downfall in local business, residential development, and student enrollment in local schools.

            Schools are now faced with reality of consolidation, and this means that a community may lose its high school.  This is a scary situation for a majority of school district’s patrons.  Many view losing their public school as a gravestone that marks the death of a community.  In addition, school districts that are fewer than a mere ten miles from each other, refuse to work together to benefit the students because of rivalries that have been in place for decades.

            However, recent state legislation states that schools must learn to cooperate and give the message that if small public schools want to remain, they will remain small by choice.  This means that schools will suffer economic penalties for refusing to combine with another school.  These state funds are needed to provide quality education for students around the state.

            If recent trends continue, South Dakota will experience a sharp decline in its population, and a loss of population would ostracize already ailing school enrollment figures.  People that were once destined to come back to the family farm are now moving out of South Dakota into the neighboring states of Iowa, Minnesota, and Nebraska.  Recent projections by the South Dakota Department of Agriculture estimate that in twenty years South Dakota will contain virtually twenty communities.  Although this is a mere projection, this fact is troublesome and is a tough figure to swallow.

            Lost in the shuffle of this political mess are the students.  Students that have been educated in South Dakota have proven to be above level according to No Child Left Behind testing.  These students are our future and subsequently we must take into account the best interest of our bright students.

How can we solve this problem of school consolidation?  As South Dakotans we must realize that we can come together and strengthen our state, a state that has taken pride in commitment to hard work and our way of life.  Consolidation is a scary word, but by working together and looking past our differences, we can make South Dakota a better place.

            As a member of a class of eleven students, I have observed trends among the attitudes of a small class.  Students are more than willing to work together with neighboring towns and develop relationships that improve and expand the curriculum available to them.  By combining with adjacent towns, schools are able to offer classes and activities that were previously unavailable had consolidation not occurred.  For example, the National FFA Organization is not offered as a co curricular activity in School A, but if School A combines with School B which has FFA, students from School A would now be able to be involved in the organization that helps to build needed leadership skills in order to develop well-rounded students.  In the situation School A and School B are complimenting each other, and they have both created a situation where the strong points of each school have created a learning environment that is beneficial to the students.

            I hope that I have given insight into the debate of small school consolidation by giving the perspective of a student.  We as South Dakotans can use our resources to develop a situation that is in the best interest of the students of our state, and by using the knowledge of our past, we can help to strengthen the education program of South Dakota and build a brighter future for generations to come. 

Scott Paul Stahl, age 18
Bridgewater
High School, Class of 2004