| DOE Home | Calendar | Site Index | DOE WebCam |

Administrative Memorandum
 

May
2004

bd15155_1

In every issue:

bd15155_1

bs00975_ Upcoming Events

Lsrprnt2 Printable Version


Filebox Admin Memo Archive

bd15155_1

  pencil2 SIGN UP NOW!
          
Receive the Admin
             Memo via email

Your email address is:

bd15155_1
For editorial information,
contact Karon Schaack at karon.schaack@state.sd.us.
bd15155_1


It is the policy of the Department of Education to provide services to all persons, without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sex, disability, ancestry, or national origin, in accordance with federal and state laws.

 

 

USDOE announces NCLB flexibility for “highly qualified teacher” provisions

The South Dakota Department of Education recently received information from the US Department of Education about additional NCLB flexibility in the implementation of the “highly qualified teacher” provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). 

The new flexibility is focused on teachers who teach multiple subjects, particularly rural and experienced teachers, and teachers of science.  South Dakota officials believe it offers the state additional opportunities to address some of the misunderstandings and practical challenges.

It will be necessary for the state to submit an amendment to its State Consolidated Application as that document contains the state’s current plans for meeting the highly qualified teacher goals.

Details of the policies include:

Rural Teachers: Teachers in small, rural and isolated areas that are currently in eligible districts (REAP definition) and are highly qualified in at least one subject, will have three more years to become highly qualified in the additional subjects they teach, which extends the deadline to the end of the 2006-07 school year.  Newly hired teachers have until their third year of teaching.  It is important to note that this applies to districts and not to individual attendance centers. 

Science Teachers: States have flexibility to use their own certification standards to determine subject-matter competency, rather than requiring it for each science subject. For example, if a state certifies teachers in the general field of science, a science teacher may demonstrate subject-matter competency through a "broad field" test or major. If a state requires certification or licensure in the specific science subjects, such as chemistry, biology or physics, the teacher would be required to demonstrate competency in each of the subjects.

Veteran Teachers of Multiple subjects: Experienced teachers who teach multiple subjects, particularly teachers in middle schools and those teaching students with special needs, have the option of instead of taking a test or going back to school--to demonstrate subject-matter competency through a process called HOUSSE (high objective uniform state standard of evaluation). HOUSSE may include a teacher's years of experience, high-quality professional development success as measured by a teacher's students' test scores, continuing education and other objective evaluations.

In his recent letter, U.S. Secretary of Education Rod Paige acknowledges that teachers are the single most important factor in improving student achievement.  He notes:

I am committed to ensuring that all teachers teaching core academic subjects are highly qualified, especially teachers in poor and disadvantaged areas.  This flexibility also comes with responsibility.  We expect you to continue to work to ensure that all of your teachers are highly qualified.

The letter indicates that the US Department “…will implement a monitoring plan through which the Department will assess the continued progress of the States in attaining their annual measurable objectives for increasing the percentage of core academic classes taught by highly qualified teachers… .”

DOE is working to clarify how it will implement the new flexibility for South Dakota teachers.  With the new requirements for teacher testing tied to certification, additional thought will need to be given to the roll out of these policies.

Further updates on South Dakota’s flexibility for the “highly qualified teachers” provisions can be expected in future editions of the Administrative Memorandum.