| DOE Home | Calendar | Site Index | DOE WebCam |

Administrative Memorandum
 

May
2004

bd15155_1

In every issue:

bd15155_1

bs00975_ Upcoming Events

Lsrprnt2 Printable Version


Filebox Admin Memo Archive

bd15155_1

  pencil2 SIGN UP NOW!
          
Receive the Admin
             Memo via email

Your email address is:

bd15155_1
For editorial information,
contact Karon Schaack at karon.schaack@state.sd.us.
bd15155_1


It is the policy of the Department of Education to provide services to all persons, without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sex, disability, ancestry, or national origin, in accordance with federal and state laws.

 

 
Praxis certification tests validated; two-step phase-in planned in 2005, 2006

Validation of the Praxis series of professional examinations for beginning teachers for use in South Dakota is nearing completion.  In addition, a two-step phase-in system has been established for the implementation of the Praxis exams into the state’s certification process.

Beginning July 1, 2005, the state will use a range of acceptable scores to judge the teachers’ preparation and readiness for certification; during the initial year, teachers will need to meet or exceed the bottom score of the qualifying range. Beginning July 1, 2006, a single cut score will be used to determine the teacher’s readiness for certification. The score will be set following analysis of data from tests taken between July 1, 2005-June 30, 2006.

Teacher education students who graduate at the end of the Fall 2005 semester will be the first group of new teachers required to submit passing test scores to DOE in both content and pedagogy in order to be certified.

Tests for existing teachers will be available for the first time during the April 2005 test period.  Results of the exams become available in 4-6 weeks, allowing teachers who do not pass on the first try to retake the test if necessary during the June 2005 testing window.  Submission of passing scores to DOE any time after July 1, 2005, will allow a teacher to add additional endorsements to a previously-issued certificate.

Validation of the examinations for use in South Dakota involves a process facilitated by the contractor, Educational Testing Services (ETS).  Groups of practicing teachers in the specific content area from across the state have attended validation committee meetings throughout the fall and winter, working with ETS subject experts to conduct the review for test content appropriateness and fairness.  The purpose is to assure that the tests are appropriate for South Dakota teachers both in alignment to SD content standards as well as the state’s teacher preparation standards.  The results of these panels are documented by ETS and a qualifying score is recommended for each content area.

As a part of the EveryTeacher program, additional studies will be conducted this summer; representatives of higher ed teacher preparation programs in the state will meet with practicing teachers to review the exams and recommend a range of qualifying scores that will be used during the first year of implementation of the tests, July 1, 2005 – June 30, 2006.  Teachers taking the tests in the first year (2005-2006) will need to meet or exceed the bottom score of the qualifying range.

Test scores from both new and existing South Dakota teachers will be analyzed during the first year of implementation and will be used to make the final determination of a single qualifying score for each content area.  The score recommendations will be reviewed by a representative panel; a final recommendation will be submitted to the SD Board of Education for approval by July 1, 2006.

ETS does not offer an examination in a few specialized certifications areas that are not considered “core content.”  In those cases, a teacher will need to complete the prescribed coursework and pass the level-specific pedagogy test in order to be certified. 

DOE plans to provide educators with further updates throughout the implementation period.  Special thanks to K-12 teachers and higher ed representatives who have participated in the validation process, as well as to administrators who have made it possible for release of educators from classroom duties during the validation committee meetings.  Input from a representative sample of practitioners was critical for making the “right” decisions regarding this new initiative.