|
|
 |
| Quick Links |
| Press Room |
| Contact Information |
| Site Help |
| Site Search
|
|
|
Office of Educational Services & Support |
| |
|
Title I Part A - Basic Programs
|
|
Sec. 1120. Participation of Children Enrolled
in Private Schools
- General Provisions
- Consultations
- Allocations
The mandate requiring local school districts to use a portion of their Title I grants
to provide compensatory education services to private school students has been a part of
the Title I authorizing legislation since the original 1965 law was enacted. LEAs are
required to consult with private school officials on important issues such as the location
of services. Furthermore, Title I personnel should meet with private school officials to
discuss the design and development of the Title I program.
The 1985 Supreme Court decision entitled Aguilar v. Felton stated that sending
public school teachers into religious schools was unconstitutional. This court decision
resulted in Title I services being provided in "neutral sites" such as vans,
mobile units or classrooms on public property. In 1988 Congress created a special
"capital grants" program to provide separate funding to cover the extra costs
associated with serving private school children. In 1994 the new law simply states that
capital expense funds must be spent "only for capital costs incurred to provide
equitable services for private school children
.."
On June 23, 1997 the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Agostini v. Felton. In
doing so, the Court overruled its 1985 decision in Aguilar V. Felton. Agostini
v. Felton states that Title I services may be provided in religiously-affiliated
private schools. This decision should have a positive impact on Title I services for both
public and private school children because it eliminates the legal necessity for costly
alternative arrangements for delivering Title I services to private school students.
To learn more about private school services, click on
Frequently
Asked Questions.
|
|
|
|
|
|