doe.sd.gov
>
Media Releases
Accreditation
and Certification
Certification
Alternative Certification
Certification Process
Non-Certified Administrators
Paraprofessional Certification
Praxis II Test
Principal Certification Option
Requirements for Human Relations / Indian Studies
Special Education Endorsement
Highly Qualified and Distinguished Educators
Highly Qualified Teachers
Distinguished Educators
Milken Educator Awards
National Board Certified Teachers
SD Teacher of the Year
Teacher to Teacher Support Network
Home School
K-12 Accreditation
Professional Practices
References
Civil Rights
Student Due Process
Teacher Preparation Programs
NCATE Partnership Agreement
Teacher Education Programs
Waivers
Administrative Rule Waivers
Current Waiver Holders
Assessment
and Accountability
Accountability
Assessment
ACT
SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium
Common Core Assessment
Dakota STEP
Dakota STEP - A
e-Metric
End of Course Exams
End of Course Exams - District Created
National Assessment of Educational Progress
NCSC Alt Assessment
South Dakota Assessment Portal
South Dakota Benchmark Assessment (SDBA)
Stanford 10 (Home School)
Testing Coordinators Workshops
WIDA/ELP Testing
WriteToLearn
Technology
NCLB Title II Part D
State Technology Plans
Curriculum
and CTE
Administrators
and Teachers
CTE for Core Content
CTE Teacher Certification
Perkins Act
Perkins Data Collection System
Conference
SD EPSCoR Funds
SD Project Lead The Way
Capstone Experience
Career & Technical Student Organizations
Career Cluster/ Programs of Study
Agriculture, Food & Natural Resources
Architecture & Construction
Arts, Audio/Video Technology & Communications
Business Management & Administration
Education & Training
Finance
Government & Public Administration
Health Science
Hospitality & Tourism
Human Services
Information Technology
Law, Public Safety & Security
Manufacturing
Marketing
Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics
Transportation, Distribution
& Logistics
Career Development
Cluster Camps
K-12 Service Learning
SD MyLife.com
Teachers as Advisors
Common Core Standards
High School 2025
High School Graduation Requirements
Standards and Curriculum
Advanced Placement
Common Course Numbering
Curriculum & Content Standards
Lexile Framework for Reading
Read! SD
Reading First
Reading Up
SD Counts
Postsecondary
Finance, Grants
Data Management
E-Rate and District Technology Plans
Data Request Process
Grants Management
Consolidated Grant Application
Financial Reporting Forms
Grant Allocations
Maintenance of Effort
Monthly Federal Grant Payments
Qualified Zone Academy Bonds
School Finance
School Finance Data
Extraordinary Cost Funds
Other Revenues
School Budgets
School District Audit Status
School/Student Data
Fall Enrollment
FERPA
Personnel Record Forms
Race and Ethnicity Reporting
Safe/Drug Free School Reporting System
Statewide Longitudinal Data System
Statistical Digest
Student Information Management System
Student Membership Reports
Verification of Educational Directory
Verification of Educational Structure
School Districts
Open Enrollment
Reorganizations
School District Maps
School Directory
State Finance
Contracts
DOE Budget
Vendor Information
State Aid
Health, Nutrition
After School
21st Century Community Learning Centers
Grantees
Resources
Professional Development
Child and Adult Nutrition Services
Child and Adult Care
Food Program
Child Nutrition Reauthorization
Commodity Supplemental Food Program
Food Distribution
Program
Fresh Fruit and
Vegetable Program
National School Lunch/ School Breakfast Programs
Special Milk Program
Summer Food Service Program and Seamless Summer
Team Nutrition
The Emergency Food Assistance Program
Coordinated School Health
Coordinated School Health Approach
Policy
Health Education
Physical Education
HIV/STD Prevention Education
Professional Development
SD Walk-n-Roll to School
Healthy Schools Project
School Health Profiles
Youth Risk Behavior Report
Title Programs
SPED, Head Start
Birth to 3
Federal Reporting
Parents Information
Service Coordinator/ Provider Information
State Interagency Coordinating Council
Head Start Collaboration Office
Special Education
Accountability Process
Advisory Panel
Complaints, Mediations and Due Process
Comprehensive Plans
Coordinated Early Intervention Services
Early Intervention (section 619)
Family Education
Rights & Privacy Act
Individual Education Program
IDEA Flowtrhough Funds
Parental Rights
Positive Behavioral Intervention Support
Response to Intervention
Section 504
State Performance Plan
Transition
Title Programs
Choice/ Supplemental Educational Services
Committee of Practitioners
Consolidated Title Reviews
Federal Monitoring
Flexibility Waiver Implementation
Title I Part A - Basic Programs
Title I Part C - Migrant Programs
Title I Part D - At Risk Youth
Title II Part D - Technology
Title III - English Language Acquisition
Title X Part C - McKinney-Vento Homeless Children and Youth Education
QUICK LINKS
2013 Legislature
A-Z Index
About the Department
Board of Education
Common Core
Content Standards
Indian Education
Report Card
School Directory
Statistical Digest
Stimulus
PRESS ROOM
News Releases
Publications
CONTACT
INFORMATION
Contact Us
RESOURCES
K-12 Data Center
SD Codified Laws
State Library
Teacher 411
Virtual School
BACK TO HOME
Searching for presenters for the 2013 Summit, Sept. 29-Oct. 1 in Chamberlain
Latest Media Releases
For Immediate Release:
June 29, 2011
Contact:
Mary Stadick Smith - (605) 773-7228
State to hold bar steady for school progress determinations
South Dakota schools will be playing by last year’s rules when it comes to the state issuing determinations of adequate yearly progress, or AYP, later this summer. Determination of AYP is an annual process required under No Child Left Behind.
State Secretary of Education Melody Schopp announced via conference call to superintendents today that South Dakota will hold its goals for proficiency in reading and math at 2009-10 levels, rather than bumping up those targets as previously anticipated. In addition, the state will reduce its graduation rate goal to 80 percent from the current target of 85 percent.
In a letter to the U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, Schopp wrote: “Without making these changes, we believe our accountability system, as it currently stands, would inappropriately label schools as failing. This situation would eventually trigger a number of NCLB-related sanctions that our department simply does not have the capacity to address.”
Schopp cited a number of reasons for the change – chief among them flaws in the current system for school accountability, as well as a lack of reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, or ESEA, also referred to as NCLB.
“Everyone recognizes that the standards imposed under NCLB become increasingly unrealistic over the next two or three years,” Schopp said. “That is why it was widely assumed that ESEA would be reauthorized and rewritten by sometime this spring. Gridlock in Congress has prevented that from happening and requires us to take this step.”
All states will be required to move to a new method of calculating graduation rate. Under this method, students who do not complete high school in four years count negatively against a school. “We know this change will have a negative impact on schools – even as they are trying to do the right thing for kids,” Schopp said. “By moving to a goal of 80 percent, we soften that blow and still maintain a respectable goal for graduation within four years. Most importantly, we don’t give up on those students who do not complete high school in four years.”
Schopp is hopeful that, because of federal delays in reauthorizing ESEA, the U.S. Department of Education will grant South Dakota a waiver to adopt these standards. She noted that the state will be moving forward with developing a new accountability system – one based on nine key principles developed in conjunction with 40 other states across the country. While sharing commonalities with other states, the new system will be one that is unique to South Dakota, and one that is “legitimate, useful and promotes continuous improvement,” according to Schopp.
“South Dakota remains committed to accountability, and I believe our track record in the area of student achievement demonstrates that commitment,” Schopp wrote. “South Dakota students routinely score above the national average on the National Assessment of Educational Progress as well as on the ACT. Proficiency levels on our state test also remain high. Certainly, we have issues and challenges, which we recognize and are seeking to address.”
Until a new accountability system is in place, South Dakota schools will be held accountable at the 2009-10 targets for proficiency in reading and math.
--30--